Knowledge Base:  
Understanding Paint Volume Solids
Last Updated: 09/15/2026

Understanding Paint Volume Solids

The number printed beside “solids by volume” on a coating data sheet may look like just another technical specification. In practice, it is one of the most useful numbers available to an applicator, estimator, inspector, or coatings professional.

Paint volume solids help determine how much coating remains on the surface after drying or curing. The value is used to estimate wet-film thickness, dry-film thickness, theoretical coverage, material requirements, and the effect of adding thinner.

Understanding volume solids can help answer three important questions:

  • How thick must the wet coating be to achieve the required dry-film thickness?
  • How much surface can one gallon or liter theoretically cover?
  • What happens to film build when thinner or reducer is added?

What Are Paint Volume Solids?

Volume solids are the percentage of the liquid coating’s volume that theoretically remains as part of the dry paint film after the volatile portion has left.

A liquid coating generally contains two broad categories of material:

  • Nonvolatile material: Binder, pigment, extenders, and other ingredients that become part of the dry coating film.
  • Volatile material: Solvents, water, and other ingredients that leave the coating during drying or curing.

If a coating is listed as 60% solids by volume, approximately 60% of its applied liquid volume theoretically remains in the dry film. The other approximately 40% is the volatile portion that leaves during drying or curing.

Important: This does not mean the coating loses 40% of its weight. Volume solids and weight solids are different properties.

A Simple Volume-Solids Example

Imagine applying 10 gallons of a coating containing 60% solids by volume.

Theoretically:

  • Approximately 6 gallons of volume become part of the dry coating film.
  • Approximately 4 gallons of volume leave as water, solvent, or other volatile material.

This is a simplified theoretical example. Actual application also involves overspray, material remaining in equipment, surface roughness, uneven film build, and other losses.

Where Is the Volume-Solids Value Found?

The coating manufacturer normally lists volume solids on the product data sheet or technical data sheet. It may appear as:

  • Volume solids
  • Solids by volume
  • Volume nonvolatile
  • Nonvolatile matter by volume
  • Percent solids by volume

The value may include a manufacturing or testing tolerance, such as 60% plus or minus 2%. Color, tint base, batch, and test method can sometimes affect the reported value.

When working with a multicomponent coating, use the volume-solids value for the properly mixed material—not the value of one individual component.

How Are Volume Solids Determined?

Coating manufacturers and laboratories may determine volume nonvolatile matter using recognized test methods.

Referenced methods include:

These standards are copyrighted or controlled technical documents. The complete current method should be obtained and followed when laboratory determination or contractual compliance is required.

Volume Solids Versus Weight Solids

Volume solids and weight solids are not interchangeable.

Volume Solids

Volume solids describe how much of the coating’s liquid volume theoretically remains in the dry film. This is the value used for:

  • Wet-film thickness calculations
  • Dry-film thickness estimates
  • Theoretical spreading rate
  • Coverage calculations
  • Estimating coating quantities

Weight Solids

Weight solids describe how much of the coating’s liquid weight remains after the volatile material leaves.

Pigments and fillers can be much denser than resins, water, or solvents. Consequently, a coating may have a high percentage of solids by weight but a significantly lower percentage of solids by volume.

Never substitute weight solids for volume solids in a WFT or DFT calculation.

Volume Solids Versus VOC

Volume solids and volatile organic compound content, or VOC, are also different properties.

VOC describes regulated organic compounds that can be released from a coating. Volume solids describe the percentage of liquid volume theoretically remaining in the dry film.

A waterborne coating may contain a substantial volatile portion made primarily of water while having relatively low VOC content. Therefore, a low-VOC coating is not automatically a high-volume-solids coating.

Likewise, two coatings with similar volume-solids percentages can have different VOC contents because the chemistry and composition of their volatile portions differ.

Using Volume Solids to Calculate Wet-Film Thickness

The most common field use of volume solids is calculating the wet-film thickness required to produce a specified dry-film thickness.

For an unreduced coating:

Required WFT = Required DFT ÷ Volume Solids as a Decimal

Example: Calculating Required WFT

A coating must produce 4 mils DFT and contains 60% solids by volume.

4 mils ÷ 0.60 = 6.67 mils WFT

The theoretical wet-film target is approximately 6.7 mils.

In metric units, the formula works the same way. If the required DFT is 100 microns and the coating is 60% solids by volume:

100 microns ÷ 0.60 = 167 microns WFT

Using Volume Solids to Estimate DFT

If the measured wet-film thickness is known, the expected dry-film thickness may be estimated:

Expected DFT = Measured WFT × Volume Solids as a Decimal

Example: Estimating DFT

A 60%-volume-solids coating is applied at 7 mils WFT.

7 mils × 0.60 = 4.2 mils DFT

The theoretical dry-film thickness is approximately 4.2 mils.

This is an estimate, not a substitute for measuring the coating after it has dried or cured.

How Thinning Changes Effective Volume Solids

Thinner or reducer normally increases liquid volume without adding film-forming solids. The amount of solid material remains essentially the same, but it is distributed through a larger volume of liquid.

The result is a lower effective percentage of solids by volume in the mixed coating.

When thinner is added as a percentage of the original coating volume, effective volume solids may be estimated as:

Effective Volume Solids = Original Volume Solids ÷ (1 + Thinner Fraction)

Example: Adding 10% Thinner

A coating contains 60% solids by volume and is reduced by adding 10% thinner based on the original coating volume.

60% ÷ 1.10 = 54.5% Effective Volume Solids

The mixed coating now has an estimated effective volume-solids content of approximately 54.5%.

If the required DFT remains 4 mils:

4 mils ÷ 0.545 = 7.34 mils WFT

Without thinner, approximately 6.7 mils WFT was required. After adding 10% thinner, approximately 7.3 mils WFT is theoretically required to produce the same 4 mils DFT.

This example assumes the thinner contributes no film-forming solids and that “10% reduction” means 10% of the original coating volume. Always confirm the manufacturer’s terminology and instructions.

Thinning Does Not Create More Coating Solids

Adding thinner may make a coating easier to atomize or apply under approved conditions, but it does not normally create more usable dry film.

Thinner may:

  • Reduce viscosity.
  • Change atomization.
  • Change flow and leveling.
  • Increase the liquid volume being applied.
  • Increase the required WFT for the same DFT.
  • Increase the amount of volatile material released.
  • Increase the possibility of runs, sags, or solvent entrapment.
  • Cause the finished film to be too thin if the WFT target is not adjusted.
Only use a manufacturer-approved thinner, and do not exceed the permitted reduction.

Using Volume Solids to Calculate Theoretical Coverage

Volume solids can also be used to estimate the theoretical area that a coating can cover at a specified DFT.

U.S. Formula: Square Feet per Gallon

Theoretical Coverage = 1,604 × Volume Solids as a Decimal ÷ DFT in Mils

Example

A coating is 60% solids by volume and will be applied at 4 mils DFT.

1,604 × 0.60 ÷ 4 = 240.6 square feet per gallon

The theoretical coverage is approximately 241 square feet per gallon.

Metric Formula: Square Meters per Liter

Theoretical Coverage = 1,000 × Volume Solids as a Decimal ÷ DFT in Microns

For a 60%-volume-solids coating applied at 100 microns DFT:

1,000 × 0.60 ÷ 100 = 6 square meters per liter

Theoretical Coverage Is Not Actual Coverage

Theoretical coverage assumes that every usable drop of coating forms a perfectly uniform film at the specified thickness. Real-world coating application does not work that way.

Actual coverage may be reduced by:

  • Overspray
  • Material remaining in containers, pumps, hoses, or spray guns
  • Surface profile and roughness
  • Porous or absorbent substrates
  • Wind and ventilation
  • Part geometry
  • Edges, corners, welds, bolts, and stiffeners
  • Uneven application
  • Excessive overlap
  • Application technique
  • Mixing and transfer losses
  • Spillage and cleanup
  • Thinning or reduction

For this reason:

Actual Coverage = Theoretical Coverage × Transfer and Application Efficiency

The efficiency factor should be based on experience with the coating, equipment, part geometry, application environment, and project conditions. One universal loss factor does not fit every job.

Does Higher Volume Solids Mean Better Paint?

Not automatically.

Higher-volume-solids coatings may provide certain advantages:

  • More dry film from a given wet-film thickness.
  • Potentially greater film build per coat.
  • Potentially lower volatile emissions.
  • Fewer coats for some applications.
  • Reduced solvent loss.
  • Potentially improved material efficiency.

However, high-solids coatings can also present application challenges:

  • Higher viscosity.
  • Greater equipment demands.
  • More difficult atomization.
  • Shorter pot life for some multicomponent coatings.
  • More sensitivity to temperature.
  • Greater risk of excessive film build.
  • More demanding mixing and proportioning requirements.

A lower-volume-solids coating may be exactly right for a particular substrate, finish, application method, or service condition. Coating quality cannot be determined from volume solids alone.

What Does “100% Solids” Mean?

A coating described as 100% solids is formulated so that essentially all of its applied volume is intended to become part of the cured film.

Examples may include certain:

  • Plural-component epoxies
  • Tank and pipeline linings
  • Flooring materials
  • Elastomeric systems
  • UV-cured coatings

In a simplified calculation, a 100%-solids coating applied at 20 mils wet would be expected to produce approximately 20 mils dry.

Actual results may still be affected by mixing accuracy, chemical reaction, trapped air, surface profile, temperature, application technique, material tolerance, and the test method used to determine solids content.

Multicomponent Coatings and Volume Solids

Two-component and plural-component coatings must be mixed in the correct ratio before their applied volume-solids value is meaningful.

Errors in proportioning can affect:

  • Cure
  • Film formation
  • Hardness
  • Chemical resistance
  • Adhesion
  • Volume solids
  • Expected coverage
  • Final film thickness

Do not calculate application requirements using the volume solids of the base component alone. Use the manufacturer’s value for the properly combined material at the specified mixing ratio.

Why Calculated DFT May Differ From Measured DFT

The equation connecting WFT, volume solids, and DFT is valuable, but field results may not match the calculation exactly.

Possible reasons include:

  • The WFT measurement represents only a small location.
  • The coating may flow or level after measurement.
  • Solvent may evaporate before the WFT reading is taken.
  • The surface may be rough, profiled, porous, or absorbent.
  • The volume-solids value may include a stated tolerance.
  • The coating may have been reduced incorrectly.
  • The components may have been mixed at the wrong ratio.
  • Film build may vary across the spray pattern.
  • The DFT gauge may require adjustment for the substrate or surface profile.
  • The coating may not have completed its drying or curing process.
WFT calculations provide process guidance. Final DFT should be measured directly when thickness is a project requirement.

Common Volume-Solids Mistakes

Using Weight Solids in the WFT Formula

This is one of the most common mistakes. Use solids by volume for film-thickness and coverage calculations.

Using the Volume Solids of One Component

For a multicomponent coating, use the value for the properly mixed material.

Ignoring Thinner

Approved thinner changes the effective volume-solids percentage and increases the WFT required to achieve the same DFT.

Assuming Theoretical Coverage Is Guaranteed

Theoretical coverage does not include normal jobsite losses.

Assuming High Solids Means High Quality

Volume solids describe film-forming volume. They do not independently establish adhesion, durability, weathering resistance, or suitability for service.

Confusing Volume Solids With VOC

Water and exempt compounds can affect the relationship between volatile content, VOC, and volume solids.

Ignoring the Manufacturer’s Tolerance

A data sheet may state a nominal volume-solids value with an allowable variation. Calculations should not be treated as more precise than the source data.

Practical Jobsite Checklist

Before calculating wet-film thickness or material requirements:

  • Obtain the current product data sheet.
  • Confirm the correct product and color.
  • Identify the specified DFT range.
  • Locate the solids-by-volume value.
  • Do not substitute solids by weight.
  • Confirm the mixing ratio for multicomponent coatings.
  • Determine whether thinning is permitted.
  • Account for any approved thinner.
  • Calculate the target WFT.
  • Estimate theoretical coverage.
  • Apply an appropriate loss or efficiency factor for estimating.
  • Measure WFT during application.
  • Measure DFT after drying or curing when required.
  • Document the values and calculations used.

The Bottom Line

Volume solids tell you how much of the liquid coating theoretically remains to form the dry paint film. That one value connects the material in the container to wet-film thickness, dry-film thickness, spreading rate, and coating consumption.

Use solids by volume—not solids by weight. Account for approved thinner. Recognize that theoretical coverage does not include application losses. Measure the wet film while applying the coating, and verify the dry film after it cures.

The data sheet provides the percentage. The calculation establishes the target. The application determines what reaches the surface.

Technical Notice: This article provides general educational information and does not replace the coating manufacturer’s current product data sheet, project specification, safety requirements, or complete ASTM, ISO, or regulatory test methods. Product values, mixing instructions, reduction limits, and application requirements vary. Always follow the current written instructions for the specific coating.



Was this article helpful?

Comments:
 

Related Articles
 > Technical Papers
 > 30 Field and Diagnostic Tests for Assessing an Applied Paint Film
 > How to Use a Wet-Film Thickness Gauge
 > How to Measure Dry-Film Thickness
 > The Difference Between WFT and DFT
 > The Difference Between WFT and DFT
 > How to Perform a Tape-Adhesion Test
 > Understanding Pull-Off Adhesion Results
 > One Tiny Opening, One Big Problem: What Is a Holiday in a Protective Coating?
 > Dry to the Touch—But Not Ready for Work: How to Recognize Incomplete Coating Cure
 > The Bubble Is a Clue: Common Causes of Paint Blistering
 > Powder on the Paint: Chalking or Just Surface Contamination?
 > When Paint Starts Coming Apart: Cracking, Checking, Flaking, and Erosion Explained
 > If It Isn’t Written Down, It Didn’t Happen: How to Document a Coating Inspection
 > The Language of Finishing: A Paint and Coatings Industry Glossary
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary A–B
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary C–D
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary E–F
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary G–H
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary I–K
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary L–M
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary N–O
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary P–Q
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary R
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary S
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary T
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary U–V
 > The Language of Finishing: Paint and Coatings Glossary W–Z
 > The Language of Finishing: Coatings Standards and Acronyms
 > Transfer Efficiency Versus Application Efficiency | Putting Paint on the Part Is Only Half the Job
 > Airflow You Can Prove: Measuring Spray-Booth Airflow and Pressure
 > If You Cannot Prove the Measurement, You Do Not Have a Measurement: Calibration, Verification and Traceable Inspection Records
 > Protective Linings for Industrial Coating Contractors | Article 03 of 20 - Reading a Protective-Lining Specification