AIRSPRAYTECH ACADEMY
Finishing Quality - From Spec to Sign-Off | Article 27 of 28
Build a Quality Team That Includes the People Doing the Work
The people holding the spray gun should have a seat at the quality table.
Quality is often treated as the responsibility of inspectors, engineers, managers, and people who prepare reports. Those roles are important, but they do not see every part of the finishing process.
Applicators, pretreatment operators, rackers, material mixers, oven operators, maintenance technicians, and laboratory personnel work directly with the process. They see, hear, feel, and sometimes smell changes before those changes appear on a dashboard or inspection report.
A strong finishing-quality team brings these people together. It gives them the information, authority, and opportunity to help control and improve the process.
Quality Is Not a Department
The quality department may maintain procedures, perform inspections, control instruments, review records, and authorize product release. It cannot create a stable finishing process by itself.
Quality is produced through:
- Correct incoming materials
- Clean and properly prepared parts
- Controlled water and pretreatment chemistry
- Proper coating storage and preparation
- Maintained equipment
- Skilled application
- Controlled environmental and cure conditions
- Accurate inspection and testing
- Careful handling and packaging
Those activities cross many departments. The quality team should reflect that reality.
Shop-floor rule:
Do not build a quality team made entirely of people who never operate the finishing process.
Who Should Be on the Team?
Membership should match the facility, process, and product risks. A finishing-quality team may include:
- Liquid and powder applicators
- Pretreatment and wash-line operators
- Racking and masking personnel
- Material-mixing and coating-room personnel
- Booth, conveyor, and oven operators
- Maintenance technicians
- Laboratory and quality personnel
- Production supervision
- Engineering and process personnel
- Receiving and purchasing personnel
- Customer-service or warranty personnel
- Management with authority to provide resources
Every meeting does not require every person. Maintain a core team and invite additional employees when their process knowledge applies to the issue being discussed.
Include Every Shift
A first-shift quality team cannot fully represent a process that runs on second or third shift. Staffing, temperature, maintenance response, production mix, supervision, and material condition may vary by shift.
Include representatives from each shift or rotate participation. Meeting notes and actions should be communicated to employees who were not present.
Compare process measurements, defects, rework, downtime, and inspection results by shift. The objective is not to rank people. It is to identify conditions that may not exist throughout the entire day.
Give the Team a Clear Purpose
A team without a defined purpose can become another meeting. Create a short written charter that states what the team is expected to accomplish.
The team's responsibilities may include:
- Reviewing process and product-quality performance
- Identifying developing problems
- Reviewing defects, repairs, rework, and customer complaints
- Participating in root-cause investigations
- Recommending process improvements
- Reviewing work instructions and control plans
- Identifying training and equipment needs
- Following improvement actions to completion
- Confirming that corrective actions remain effective
The charter should also identify the team leader, meeting frequency, membership, decision authority, reporting method, and management sponsor.
Hold Short Process Huddles
Not every quality discussion requires a long conference-room meeting. A short daily or shift-start huddle can help the team share immediate information.
A practical huddle may review:
- The jobs and coating systems scheduled
- Material, equipment, or process changes
- Open holds or special instructions
- Problems from the previous shift
- Critical measurements requiring attention
- Maintenance or calibration activity
- Customer-specific risks
Keep the huddle focused. Larger investigations and improvement projects can be assigned to separate working sessions.
Hold a Regular Quality-Team Meeting
A weekly, biweekly, or monthly quality-team meeting provides time for deeper review. Frequency should match production volume, process risk, and current performance.
A standing agenda may include:
- Review previous action items.
- Review safety and environmental concerns affecting the finishing process.
- Review process measurements and warning trends.
- Review defects, holds, repairs, rework, and scrap.
- Review customer complaints and supplier concerns.
- Select problems requiring root-cause investigation.
- Review proposed changes and improvement trials.
- Identify training, maintenance, and resource needs.
- Assign responsibilities and completion dates.
- Recognize successful improvements and employee contributions.
Listen to the Applicators
Applicators work at the point where material, equipment, air, environment, part geometry, and technique come together.
They may notice:
- A changing spray pattern
- Unusual pump cycling or pressure fluctuation
- A change in coating flow, atomization, or coverage
- Powder surging, clumping, or poor charging
- Weak electrostatic wrap or penetration
- A part that is difficult to coat consistently
- New contamination or airflow behavior
- A fixture, hook, or rack causing repeated trouble
These observations are process information. Give operators a simple method for reporting them and make sure the reports receive a response.
Create a No-Blame Reporting Culture
Employees must be able to report an unusual condition, mistake, near miss, or developing defect without expecting immediate blame.
If the person who stops the line is punished for lost production, the next person may allow questionable work to continue. Management behavior determines whether the stop-work policy is real.
Accountability still matters. Deliberate disregard of a known procedure must be addressed. But most process problems deserve a broader investigation of instructions, training, workload, equipment, materials, measurement, communication, and supervision.
Give Employees Authority to Stop and Hold
The quality system should clearly state who may stop production, place material on hold, or request technical review.
Employees should know when to stop for conditions such as:
- Wrong or unidentified material
- Process readings outside the approved range
- Unacceptable spray pattern or powder delivery
- Suspected contamination
- Loss of grounding, airflow, or cure control
- Failed inspection or testing
- Missing or conflicting work instructions
- Equipment or instrument malfunction
The process should also define who responds, how affected work is identified, and what evidence is required before restarting.
Put Useful Information Where the Work Happens
Quality information should be visible and understandable to the people running the process.
A production-area quality board or electronic display may show:
- Current process-control status
- Film-thickness and cure trends
- Defect, repair, and rework patterns
- Open problems and assigned actions
- Maintenance and calibration status
- Recent successful improvements
- Upcoming training and process changes
Protect confidential customer information and employee privacy. The display should support improvement, not public embarrassment.
Use Measurements and Operator Knowledge Together
Data and experience should support one another. Instrument readings show what was measured. Operators provide context about what was happening when the measurement changed.
A dry-film trend may show increasing variation. The applicator may explain that the fluid pressure changes whenever another machine starts. A gloss trend may show a shift. The oven operator may report slower recovery after a loading change.
Neither the chart nor the observation should be dismissed. The team should test the relationship and act on evidence.
Review Rejects Where They Are Found
The reject and rework areas contain valuable process information. Periodically review the actual parts rather than relying only on defect counts.
Sort defects by:
- Type of defect
- Part and coating system
- Location on the part
- Applicator, shift, booth, gun, or line
- Material and batch
- Rack or oven position
- Suspected process stage
Invite the people doing the work to examine the parts and explain what they see. A recurring pattern may become obvious when the defects are placed together.
Track the Cost of Poor Quality
Defect counts do not show the complete impact. Track the labor, materials, energy, equipment time, delay, freight, and customer impact associated with poor quality.
Costs may include:
- Sorting and inspection
- Stripping and surface preparation
- Replacement coating and chemicals
- Additional booth and oven time
- Scrapped parts
- Production interruption and overtime
- Delayed shipment and premium freight
- Warranty, field repair, and customer complaints
This information helps management understand why prevention, maintenance, training, and improved equipment deserve resources.
Use a Controlled Action List
Every agreed improvement should be placed on an action list that identifies:
- The problem or opportunity
- The specific action
- The responsible owner
- Required resources
- Target completion date
- Current status
- Evidence of completion
- Effectiveness-review date and result
Begin each meeting by reviewing overdue and open actions. A team loses credibility when it identifies the same problem month after month without completing the agreed work.
Test Improvements Before Full Release
Good ideas still need controlled evaluation. Define what will change, what will remain constant, what will be measured, and what result will demonstrate improvement.
Use representative parts and normal production conditions. Record the material, equipment settings, environmental conditions, film thickness, cure, appearance, and performance results.
Obtain the required approvals before changing customer-controlled materials, processes, specifications, or inspection methods.
Update the Standard Work
When an improvement is proven, update the documents and systems that control the process.
This may include:
- Work instructions
- Control plans and inspection forms
- Equipment recipes and programs
- Preventive-maintenance schedules
- Training materials
- Sampling plans and reaction limits
- Risk reviews and process-flow documents
Remove obsolete instructions from the work area. Improvement is not complete until the new method becomes the controlled method.
Recognize Contributions
Give credit to employees who identify risks, report developing problems, improve fixtures, reduce defects, simplify inspection, or help complete corrective action.
Recognition does not have to be expensive. Mention the contribution at the quality meeting, include the employee in the report, share the improvement with management, and explain the result to the rest of the workforce.
People continue contributing when they can see that their knowledge is respected and their ideas lead to action.
Management Must Support the Team
Management support means more than attending the first meeting. Leaders must provide time, information, training, maintenance, instruments, and authority.
Management should remove obstacles when the team identifies a valid need. If production output is always given priority over process control, the team will learn that quality discussions are ceremonial.
Leaders should review the team's progress, ask what support is needed, and hold action owners accountable without taking ownership away from the team.
Measure Team Effectiveness
Do not measure the team by the number of meetings held. Evaluate whether its work improves the process.
Useful measures may include:
- Reduction in defects, repair, rework, and scrap
- Fewer customer complaints and late shipments
- Faster response to process warnings
- Completion and effectiveness of corrective actions
- Improved process stability and capability
- Employee suggestions evaluated and implemented
- Reduced repeat failures
- Improved communication between shifts and departments
The End of Production Is Not the End of Quality
Product release confirms that one lot met its requirements. The quality team must carry the learning into the next job, the next shift, and the next process review.
Review what worked, what changed, what nearly failed, and what should be improved. Quality should become stronger each time the process runs.
The people doing the work are not merely expected to follow the quality system. They should help build it.
The Takeaway
Build a finishing-quality team that includes applicators, operators, maintenance, laboratory personnel, quality staff, supervision, engineering, purchasing, and management.
Give the team a clear purpose, useful data, authority to stop questionable work, time to investigate problems, and responsibility for completing improvements.
The most valuable quality information is often already standing beside the line. Invite it into the meeting and listen.
Measure It. Track It. Test It. Prove It.
Copyright 2026 Azimuth Spray Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.
